Based on analysis of 695 models and 110 repositories tracked between June 2022 and November 2025, the local LLM ecosystem has reached production maturity. Developers can now run powerful code-generation models entirely on their own hardware—eliminating API costs, protecting sensitive code, and maintaining full control over AI capabilities.
As of , Ollama leads the ecosystem with 154,856 GitHub stars and 1.3M monthly NPM downloads. The framework supports 23+ open-source code models running locally on consumer hardware.
Executive Summary
Key Findings
- 695 local LLM models tracked across HuggingFace (data collected )
- 15+ production-ready frameworks for running models locally
- Ollama dominates with 154,856 GitHub stars, 13,475 forks
- Zero API costs: Run GPT-4-class models on your laptop
- Privacy-first: Code never leaves your machine
- DeepSeek Coder: 588,293 downloads (most popular code model)
- 110 GitHub repositories building local coding tools
The Frameworks: Production Infrastructure
As of , developers have 15 mature frameworks to choose from. Here's how they rank by community adoption:
| Framework | GitHub Stars | Description | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ollama | 154,856 | Get up and running with DeepSeek-R1, Gemma 3, and other models | General use, easiest setup |
| Tabby | 32,316 | Self-hosted AI coding assistant | Code completion, team deployments |
| Continue.dev | 29,518 | Ship faster with Continuous AI | IDE integration (VS Code, IntelliJ) |
| LM Studio | N/A (Closed-source) | Desktop app with GUI for running local models | Non-technical users, GUI preference |
| GPT4All | Community-backed | Run LLMs locally on consumer hardware | CPU-only inference, low-resource environments |
| llama.cpp | Infrastructure layer | C++ inference engine powering many frameworks | Performance-critical applications |
Data sources: GitHub repository data collected . NPM download data collected .
The Models: State-of-the-Art Code Generation
As of , 23 open-source code models are tracked in production use. Here are the leaders by HuggingFace downloads:
| Model | Downloads | Developer | Specialization |
|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek Coder 1.3B Instruct | 588,293 | DeepSeek AI | Code generation, instruction-following |
| CodeLlama 34B | 316,418 | Meta | Multi-language code generation |
| StarCoder2 3B | High adoption | BigCode | Lightweight code completion |
| DeepSeek V3 | Latest release | DeepSeek AI | Reasoning + code (GPT-4 class) |
| Qwen Coder 30B | Growing fast | Alibaba Cloud | Enterprise-grade code generation |
Data collected: HuggingFace download statistics as of .
Cost Analysis: Local vs. Cloud APIs
The financial case for local LLMs is compelling. Here's a 12-month cost comparison for a team of 10 developers:
| Approach | Upfront Cost | Monthly Cost | 12-Month Total | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OpenAI GPT-4 API | $0 | ~$2,000 | $24,000 | Based on 500K tokens/dev/month at $0.03/1K tokens |
| Anthropic Claude API | $0 | ~$1,500 | $18,000 | Slightly cheaper than GPT-4 |
| Local LLM (Ollama + DeepSeek) | $1,500 | $0 | $1,500 | One-time hardware cost (RTX 4090 or M2 Max) |
| Local LLM (CPU-only) | $0 | $0 | $0 | Runs on existing developer laptops (slower) |
Break-even analysis: A one-time $1,500 GPU investment pays for itself in 1 month compared to GPT-4 API costs for a 10-person team.
Privacy and Security: Why Local Matters
Based on discussions across 610 GitHub threads analyzed in our dataset, privacy is the #1 driver of local LLM adoption:
What Developers Are Saying
"We can't send proprietary code to OpenAI's API. Running DeepSeek locally means our IP never leaves the building." — GitHub discussion,
"Ollama + Continue.dev is now our default setup. Zero latency, zero privacy concerns, zero API bills." — Reddit r/LocalLLaMA,
Key Privacy Advantages
- Zero data exfiltration: Code never leaves your infrastructure
- Compliance-friendly: Meets GDPR, HIPAA, SOC 2 requirements
- No vendor lock-in: Switch models anytime without API migration
- Offline capable: Works without internet connectivity
- Audit trail control: Full visibility into model behavior
Quantization: Running 30B Models on Consumer Hardware
Our dataset tracked 10+ quantization techniques that make large models practical on consumer hardware:
| Quantization Format | Quality Loss | Memory Savings | Best Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| GGUF (Q4) | ~2-3% | 75% reduction | General use (Ollama default) |
| GGUF (Q8) | ~1% | 50% reduction | High accuracy needed |
| GPTQ | ~2-4% | 75% reduction | GPU inference |
| AWQ | ~1-2% | 75% reduction | Activation-aware (best quality) |
Real-world example: DeepSeek Coder 33B normally requires 66GB RAM (FP16). With Q4 quantization, it runs in 16GB—fitting on a MacBook Pro M2 with 32GB unified memory.
The Ecosystem: 110 Repositories Building Local Tools
Our analysis identified 110 GitHub repositories actively building on local LLMs. Here are standout projects:
| Project | Stars | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Nanocoder | 809 | Beautiful local-first coding agent for terminal |
| DevoxxGenie | 585 | IntelliJ plugin for Ollama, LMStudio, GPT4All |
| Are Copilots Local Yet? | 577 | Tracking frontier of local LLM Copilots |
| Code Llama for VS Code | 569 | Local LLM alternative to GitHub Copilot |
Data collected: GitHub repository metrics as of .
NPM Ecosystem: 65 Packages Tracked
The JavaScript ecosystem has embraced local LLMs. As of , Ollama's JavaScript SDK has 1.3M monthly downloads.
Top NPM Packages
- ollama (1.3M downloads/month): Official JavaScript SDK
- @langchain/ollama: LangChain integration for Ollama
- ollama-ai-provider: Vercel AI SDK provider
- @theia/ai-ollama: Eclipse Theia IDE integration
Methodology: How We Ranked Local LLMs
Data Collection
Time period: June 2022 - November 2025
Data collection date: (19:30:32 UTC)
Sources
- HuggingFace: 695 model records with download counts, likes, tags
- GitHub: 110 repositories tracked (stars, forks, topics, activity)
- NPM: 65 packages (download counts, versions, metadata)
- GitHub Discussions: 610 threads analyzed for sentiment and trends
- Stack Overflow: 100 questions tagged with local LLM frameworks
Ranking Criteria
- Community Adoption: GitHub stars, forks, NPM downloads
- Model Performance: Download counts as proxy for quality
- Framework Maturity: Release cadence, issue resolution time
- Developer Experience: Setup complexity, documentation quality
Models Tracked
CodeLlama, Phind-CodeLlama, WizardCoder, StarCoder, StarCoder2, DeepSeek-Coder, CodeGeeX, CodeT5+, SantaCoder, InCoder, CodeGen, PolyCoder, Replit-Code, and others.
Frameworks Tracked
Ollama, LM Studio, GPT4All, Text-Generation-WebUI, KoboldCPP, llama.cpp, Jan.ai, llamafile, MLC-LLM, ExLlama, CTransformers, vLLM, TGI.
Limitations
- NPM download counts may include CI/CD automation
- GitHub stars don't directly measure production usage
- Some models have multiple variants (quantized versions) counted separately
- Closed-source tools (LM Studio) lack public GitHub metrics
Conclusion: The Shift to Local-First Development
As of , the local LLM ecosystem has achieved production maturity:
- 695 models give developers real choice
- 15+ frameworks offer production-ready infrastructure
- Zero API costs eliminate the biggest barrier to AI adoption
- Privacy-first architecture meets enterprise compliance requirements
- Ollama's 154,856 stars signal mainstream developer adoption
For teams handling sensitive code, facing API budget constraints, or requiring offline capabilities, local LLMs are no longer a compromise—they're the strategic choice.
Getting Started
Recommended setup (5 minutes):
- Install Ollama:
curl -fsSL https://ollama.ai/install.sh | sh - Pull DeepSeek Coder:
ollama pull deepseek-coder:6.7b - Install Continue.dev extension in VS Code
- Configure Continue to use Ollama
- Start coding with AI—no API key required
About this analysis: Data collected and analyzed by Vibe Data, tracking AI development intelligence across GitHub, NPM, PyPI, HuggingFace, and other platforms. Updated daily. View machine-readable data.
Last updated:
← Back to Insights